· PAUL ROBERTS, 2014. Loss of Innocence in Common Law Presumptions Criminal Law and Philosophy. 8, 317-336.
· PAUL ROBERTS, 2014. Criminal Law Theory and the Limits of Liberalism. In: AP SIMESTER, ANJTE DU BOIS-PEDAIN and ULFRID NEUMANN, eds., Liberal Criminal Theory: Essays for Andreas von Hirsch Hart Publishing.327-360.
· PAUL ROBERTS, 2013. Fue el Bebé Sacudido? Preuba, Pericia y Epistemologia Juridica en el Proceso Penal Inglés. In: CARMEN VÁZQUEZ, ed., Estandares de prueba y prueba cientifica: Ensayos de epistemologia juridica Marcial Pons. 135-180.
· ROBERTS P, 2013. Renegotiating forensic cultures: between law, science and criminal justice. Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences. 44(1), 47-59.
· PAUL ROBERTS, 2013. Expert Evidence and Criminal Trial Procedure. In: GERBEN BRUINSMA and DAVID WEISBURD, eds., Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice Springer. 1480-1494.
· PAUL ROBERTS and WILLIAM O'BRIAN, 2013. Scientific Evidence in Criminal Prosecutions. In: GERBEN BRUINSMA and DAVID WEISBURD, eds., Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice Springer. 4701-4715.
· PAUL ROBERTS, 2012. Excluding Evidence as Protecting Constitutional or Human Rights?. In: JULIAN V ROBERTS and LUCIA ZEDNER, eds., Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Andrew Ashworth OUP. 171-190.
· PAUL ROBERTS, 2012. Oxford Jurisprudence Redux Transnational Legal Theory. 3, 180-88.
· PAUL ROBERTS, 2011. Does Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights Require Reasoned Verdicts in Criminal Trials? Human Rights Law Review. 11, 213-235.
· MIKE REDMAYNE, PAUL ROBERTS, COLIN AITKEN and GRAHAM JACKSON, 2011. Forensic Science Evidence in Question Criminal Law Review. 347-356.
· PAUL ROBERTS, 2011. Peter Tillers’ Wish List Law, Probability & Risk. 11, 13-16.
· ROBERTS, P. and SAUNDERS, C., 2010. Piloting PTWI—a socio-legal window on prosecutors’ assessments of evidence and witness credibility Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 30(1), 101-141.
· ROBERTS, P., 2009. The Science of Proof: Forensic Science Evidence in English Criminal Trials. In: FRASER, J and WILLIAMS, R., eds., Handbook of Forensic Science Willan. 446-484.
· evidence. In: JACKSON, J., LANGER, M. and TILLERS, P., eds., Crime, procedure and evidence in a comparative and international context: essays in honour of Professor Mirjan Damaska Hart. 295-328.
· ROBERTS, P. and SAUNDERS, C., 2008. Introducing pre-trial witness interviews: a flexible new fixture to the Crown Prosecutor’s toolkit Criminal Law Review. 2008(11), 831-853.
· PAUL ROBERTS, 2008. Comparative Criminal Justice Goes Global Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 28, 369-391.
· ROBERTS, P., 2007. Chapter 1: Rethinking the law of evidence: a twenty-first century agenda for teaching and research. In: ROBERTS, P. and REDMAYNE, M., eds., Innovations in evidence and proof: integrating theory, research and teaching Oxford: Hart Publishing. 19-63.
· ROBERTS, P., 2007. Comparative Law for International Criminal Justice. In: ORUCU, E. and NELKEN, D., eds.,Comparative Law - A Handbook Hart. 339-370.
· ROBERTS, P., 2007. Criminal Procedure, the Presumption of Innocence and Judicial Reasoning under the Human Rights Act. In: FENWICK, H., PHILLIPSON, G. and MASTERMAN, R., eds., Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act Cambridge University Press. 377-423.
· ROBERTS, P., 2007. Law and Criminal Investigation. In: NEWBURN, T., WILLIAMSON, T. and WRIGHT, A., eds.,Handbook of Criminal Investigation Willan. 92-145 (In Press.).
· ROBERTS, P and REDMAYNE, M, eds., 2007. Innovations In Evidence And Proof: Integrating Theory, Research And Teaching Oxford : Hart.
· ROBERTS, P., 2006. Theorising procedural tradition: subjects, objects and values in criminal adjudication. In:DUFF, A., FARMER, L., MARSHALL, S. and TADROS, V., eds., The trial on trial. Part 2: Judgement and calling to account. Oxford: Hart. 37-64.
· ROBERTS, P., 2006. Penal Offence in Question: Some Reference Points for Interdisciplinary Conversation. In:SIMESTER, A. and VON HIRSCH, A., eds., Incivilities: Regulating Offensive Behaviour Hart. 1-56.
R· OBERTS, P., COOPER, D. and JUDGE, S., 2005. Monitoring success, accounting for failure: The outcome of prosecutors' applications for special measures directions under the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE AND PROOF. VOL 9(NUMB 4), 269-290.
· ROBERTS, P., 2005. Book Review: Taylor, Wasik and Leng: Blackstone's Guide to the Criminal Justice Act 2003INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE AND PROOF. VOL 9(NUMB 2), 148-152.
· ROBERTS, P., 2005. Strict Liability and the Presumption of Innocence: An Expose of Functionalist Assumptions.In: ANDREW SIMESTER, ed., Appraising Strict Liability Oxford University Press, Oxford. 151-194.
· ROBERTS, P., 2004. Towards the principled reception of expert evidence of witness credibility in criminal trialsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE AND PROOF. VOL 8(NUMB 4), 215-232.
· ROBERTS, P., 2004. Restoration and Retribution in International Criminal Justice: An Exploratory Analysis. In:Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? Hart Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK. 115-134.
· ROBERTS, P. and MCMILLAN, N., 2003. For Criminology in International Criminal Justice Journal of International Criminal Justice. VOL 1(NUMB 2), 315-338.
· ROBERTS,P., 2002. Drug-dealing and the Presumption of Innocence: The Human Rights Act (Almost) Bites The International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 6, 17-37.
· ROBERTS, P., 2002. On Method: The Ascent of Comparative Criminal Justice Oxford Journal of Legal Studies.VOL 22(PART 3), 539-562.
· ROBERTS, P., 2002. Justice for all? Two bad arguments (and several good suggestions) for resisting double jeopardy reform INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE AND PROOF. VOL 6(PART 4), 197-217.
· ROBERTS, P., 2002. Rethinking the law of evidence: a twenty-first century agenda for teaching and research.In: LEWIS, A., ed., Current Legal Problems 55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 297-345.
· ROBERTS, P., 2002. Science, Experts and Criminal Justice. In: The Handbook of the Criminal Justice ProcessOxford University Press, Oxford. 253-284.
· ROBERTS, P., 2002. Double Jeopardy Law Reform: A Criminal Justice Commentary Modern Law Review. VOL 65(PART 3), 393-424.
· ROBERTS,P., 2001. Philosophy, Feinberg, Codification and Consent: A Progress Report on English Experiences of Criminal Law Reform Buffalo Criminal Law Review. 5, 173-253.
· ROBERTS,P., 2001. Review of Richard Nobles and David Schiff, Understanding Miscarriages of Justice (OUP, 2000) Law Quarterly Review. 117, 503-512.
· ROBERTS, P., 2001. Privacy, Autonomy and Criminal Justice Rights: Philosophical Preliminaries. In: Personal Autonomy, the Private Sphere and the Criminal Law: A Comparative Study Hart Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.49-78.
· ROBERTS, P., 2000. Review Article: Discourses on Law in Policing Policing and Society. VOL 10(PART 2), 207-218.
· ROBERTS, P., 2000. Lyal S. Sunga: The emerging system of international criminal law: Developments in codification and implementation; T.L.H. McCormack and G.J. Simpson (eds): The law of war crimes: National and international approaches INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE AND PROOF. VOL 4(PART 1), 73-76.
· ROBERTS,P., 2000. Review of Timothy L.H. McCormack and Gerry J. Simpson (eds), The Law of War Crimes: National and International Approaches (Kluwer, 1997) The International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 4, 73-76.
· ROBERTS, P., 2000. Acquitted Misconduct Evidence and Double Jeopardy Principles, From Sambasivam to ZCriminal Law Review. DEC, 952-970.
· ROBERTS, P., 1999. Evidence, proof and probability INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE AND PROOF. VOL 3(NUMBER 1), 68-70.
· ROBERTS,P., 1999. Review of Maxwell Barrett, Blackstone's Law of Evidence Index: Case Precedents 1900-1997 (Blackstone, 1998) The International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 3, 138-140.
· ROBERTS, P., 1999. Criminal Justice and the Limits of Privacy In: Unknown.
· ROBERTS,P., 1998. Review of Christine van den Wyngaert (ed), International Criminal Law: A Collection of International and European Instruments (Kluwer, 1996) The International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 2,60-68.
· ROBERTS,P., 1998. On the Preconditions and Possiblities of Criminal Law Theory South African Journal of Criminal Justice. 11, 285-324.
· ROBERTS, P., 1998. Recent Trends in English Penal Policy. In: Social Change, Social Policy and Social Work in the New Europe Ashgate Publishing Group, Aldershot & London. 97-117.
· ROBERTS,P., 1998. Review of M. Cherif Bassiouni (ed), The Protection of Human Rights in the Administration of Criminal Justice: A Compendium of United Nations Norms and Standards (Transnational Publishers, 1994) The International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 2, 60-68.
· ROBERTS,P., 1998. Review of Yoram Dinstein and Mala Tabory (eds), War Crimes in International Law (Martinus Nijhoff, 1996) The International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 2, 60-68.
· ROBERTS, P., 1998. Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: More Lessons from North America. In: REECE, H., ed., Current Legal Issues: Law and Science 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 175-219.
· ROBERTS,P., 1998. Review of John Dugard and Christine van den Wyngaert (eds), International Criminal Law & Procedure (Dartmouth, 1996) The International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 2, 60-68.
· ROBERTS, P., 1997. The Philosophical Foundations of Consent in the Criminal Law Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. VOL 17(NUMBER 3), 389-414.
· ROBERTS, P., 1997. The Law Commission Consultation Paper on Previous Misconduct: All the Usual Suspects: A Critical Appraisal of Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 141 Criminal Law Review. MNTH 2, 75-92.
· ROBERTS,P., 1997. Review of Frankin E. Zimring and Gordon Hawkins, Incapacitation: Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime (OUP, 1995) Criminal Law Review. 373-376.
· ROBERTS,P., 1997. Evidence of Previous Misconduct: Paul Roberts Replies Criminal Law Review. 369-372.
· ROBERTS,P., 1997. Consent to Injury: How Far Can You Go? Law Quarterly Review. 113, 27-35.
· ROBERTS, P., 1996. Will you stand up in court? On the admissibility of psychiatric and psychological evidenceJournal of Forensic Psychiatry. VOL 7(NUMBER 1), 63-78.
· ROBERTS, P., 1996. The admissibility of expert evidence: Lessons from America Expert Evidence. VOL 4(NUMBER 3), 93-100.
· ROBERTS, P., 1996. From Deviance to Censure: A 'New' Criminology for the Nineties Modern Law Review. VOL 59(NUMBER 1), 125-144.
· ROBERTS,P., 1996. Review of John Jackson and Sean Doran, Judge Without Jury (OUP, 1995) Law Quarterly Review. 112, 513-518.
· ROBERTS,P., 1996. Review of Herschel Prins, Offenders, Deviants or Patients? (Routledge, 1995) Criminal Law Review. 362-364.
· ROBERTS, P., 1996. Jill Hunter and Kathryn Cronin, Evidence, Advocacy and Ethical Practice: a Criminal Trial Commentary INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE AND PROOF. VOL 1(NUMBER 1), 92-97.
· ROBERTS, P., 1996. What Price a Free Market in Forensic Science Services? The Organization and Regulation of Science in the Criminal Process British Journal of Criminology. VOL 36(NUMBER 1), 37-60.
· ROBERTS,P., 1995. Review of A.T.H. Smith, Property Offences (Sweet and Maxwell, 1994) Law Quarterly Review. 111, 704-708.
· ROBERTS, P., 1995. Taking the Burden of Proof Seriously Criminal Law Review. ISSUE 10, 783.
· ROBERTS,P., 1995. Review of Michael McConville et al, Standing Accused: The Organisation and Practices of Criminal Defence Laywers in Britain (OUP 1994) Law Quarterly Review. 111, 167-172.
· ROBERTS,P., 1994. Review of Michael Moore, Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and its Implications for Criminal Law (OUP, 1993) Criminal Law Review. 393-394.
· ROBERTS,P., 1994. Review of Andrew L-T Choo, Abuse of Process and Judicial Stays of Criminal Proceedings (OUP, 1993) Law Quarterly Review. 110, 662-666.
· ROBERTS, P., 1994. Forensic Science Evidence After Runciman Criminal Law Review. 780.
· ROBERTS, P., 1994. Science in the Criminal Process Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. VOL 14(NUMBER 4), 469.
· ROBERTS,P., 1994. Obtaining Defence Experts in Criminal Proceedings: Pragmatism and the Impossible Dream 42, 1-4.
· ROBERTS,P., 1994. Remedies for Non-Disclosure After Ward Archbold News. 4 November, 5-8.
· ROBERTS, PAUL, LAWYER and WILLMORE, C. J. (CHRIS J), 1993. The role of forensic science evidence in criminal proceedings: Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study No 11 London : HMSO, 1993.
· ROBERTS,P., 1993. Social Control and the Censures of Sex Crime, Law and Social Change. 19, 171-186.
· ROBERTS,P., 1993. Review of Michael Saltman, The Demise of the Reasonable Man: A Cross-Cultural Study of a Legal Concept (Transaction, 1991) Social and Legal Studies. 2, 353-358.
· ROBERTS,P., 1993. Expert Systems Solicitors' Journal. 3 December, 39-41.
· ROBERTS,P., 1993. Review of Andrei Marmor, Interpretation and Legal Theory (OUP, 1992) Law Quarterly Review. 109, 499-503.
· ROBERTS,P., 1992. Review of Ian Grigg-Spall and Paddy Ireland (eds), The Critical Lawyers' Handbook (Pluto Press, 1992) Social and Legal Studies. 1, 565-572.
· ROBERTS,P., 1992. Review of David Carson, Professionals and the Courts: A Handbook for Expert Witnesses (Venture Press, 1990) Modern Law Review. 55, 754-757.
· ROBERTS,P., 1992. Review of Tristram Hodgkinson, Expert Evidence: Law and Practice (Sweet and Maxwell, 1990) Modern Law Review. 55, 754-757.
· ROBERTS,P., 1992. Review of Stephen Guest, Ronald Dworkin (Edinburgh UP, 1992) Modern Law Review. 55,881-885.