邹明理

( 西南政法大学, 重庆 430030)

【摘 要】本文是针对“鉴定结论必须明确”的立法建议和“鉴定结论必须准确”的鉴定工作发展目标提出的质疑。认为“鉴定结论必须明确”不符合提供证据的法律要求,以六条理由论证这一建议不宜采纳,主张以“鉴定结论应当符合科学技术标准”作为对鉴定结论的立法要求。文中以五条依据分析“鉴定必准”是一个难以实现的工作目标,主张“鉴定结论应当客观真实”才具有可行性, 才符合证据规范。

【关键词】鉴定结论; 证据要求; 客观真实; 证据要求; 科学技术标准

【中图分类号】D918.9

【文献标识码】B

【文章编号】1007-9297(2007)01-0088-07

Conflict between “Appraisal Must Be Clear and Accurate”and Requirements of Evidence Providing. ZOU Ming-li.Forensic Science Center of SWUPL, Chongqing, 430030.

【Abstract 】Questioning about the legislation suggestion of “appraisal result must be clear”and the forensic science goal of “appraisal result must be accurate”, this paper argues, supported by six implicit reasons, that the “appraisal result must be clear”is not compliant with the legal requirements of evidence providing, and it should be modified to “appraisal result should meet the science and technology standards”. Explaining the goal of “appraisal result must be clear”is impractical, the author thinks this should be changed into standard- compliant and more practical goal of “appraisal result should be objective and true”.

【Key Words 】 Appraisal result, Evidence requirements, Objective and true, Science and technology standard