第1期 | 第2期 | 第3期 | 第4期 | 第5期 | 第6期 |
李学军 张卫萍 张吉林
【摘 要】 本文讨论了刑事侦查中强制采取物证比对样本的必要性以及立法规制这种强制活动的必要性,探究了强制采样的合法化路径。认为法律应明确侦查机关有权依照必要性原则、适当性原则和比例原则在侦查中强制采取物证比对样本,并就强制采样的主体、对象、程序等问题作出具体规定,否则,就有可能侵犯相关人员的基本人权。
【关键词】 强制采取物证比对样本;物证鉴定;合法化
【中图分类号】 D918.9
【文献标识码】 A
【文章编号】 1674-1226(2009)02-0210-14
On the Necessity and Legitimization Route of Compulsory Collection of Comparative Samples of Physical Evidence in Criminal Investigation. Li Xuejun,Zhang Weiping. Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;Zhang Jilin. The Public Security Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150001
【Abstract】 This article discusses the necessity of compulsory collection of comparative samples of physical evidence in criminal investigation, the necessity of regulating the compulsory action by legal provisions and explores the legitimization route of compulsory collection of comparative samples. This author points out that our Criminal Procedure Law should explicitly provide the criminal investigation organs’ power to collect comparative samples of physical evidence in accordance with three basic principles: necessity, balance and proportionality.And the Law should have particular rules to regulate the compulsory action’s subject, object and procedure. Otherwise, there is possibility of violating the related human rights.
【Key Words】 Compulsory collection of comparative samples of physical evidence, Physical evidence authentication, Legitimization