马静华

【摘 要】 盘查记录有《当场盘问、检查笔录》和《挡获经过（说明）》两种形式，它们在制作主体、形成时间空间、证明内容等方面具有不同特点，之所以如此，源于不同的警务机制。盘查记录的诉讼证据资格不应有任何疑问，这是因为在“违法—犯罪二元追诉机制”下，刑事立案前的查缉活动由负责日常警务的警察依法进行，由此获得的证据必然具有合法性。在证明作用方面，盘查记录因其证明内容的综合性、直接性和不可替代性，从而具备了很强的诉讼推进能力。 从立法完善角度，应当统一盘查记录的形式，规范其制作方式和记载内容，明确盘查记录的诉讼证据地位。

【关键词】 刑事证据；盘查记录；证据资格；证明作用

【中图分类号】 D918.7

【文献标识码】 A

【文章编号】 1674-1226（2010）01-0066-08

The Role of "Frisk "Evidence in the Criminal Justice System. Ma Jinghua.Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan610064, P. R. China.

【Abstract】 There are generally two kinds of searches of criminal suspects: the" frisk "or pat-down at the scene of an investigation and the search at booking-in. .These two procedures differ in scope, time and place.Evidence produced during a "frisk" search is competent evidence when taken in compliance with routine procedure. The evidence obtained in a "frisk" search is often very important in a prosecution due to the immediacy of the search and the closer connection to the offense and the offender. In view of legislative improvements, there should be continuing efforts to standardize the "frisk" procedures, to regulate its means of producing and preserving evidence, and to clarify its status in the codified law.

【Key Words】 Criminal Evidence, Stop and Frisk Records, Competency of Evidence, Proof Function