———以一个《最高人民法院公报》案例为样本的分析

胡学军

【摘 要】 消费欺诈诉讼案件中对“欺诈”事实的证明责任分配依“规范说”应由消费者承担，不应由法官裁量证明责任来改变法定的证明责任分配。法官自由裁量权应在证明评价与自由心证等环节加以运用。疑难案件的解决应坚持在严格遵循法定证明责任分配原则的基础上，通过司法实践生成诉讼证明的具体规则的路径来加以解决。

【关键词】 消费欺诈；证明责任分配；自由裁量权；路径选择

【中图分类号】 D915.13

【文献标识码】 A

【文章编号】 1674-1226（2010）04-0458-09

On the Proof of Consumer Fraud Litigation Issues． Hu Xuejun. Nanchang University Law School, Nanchang,330031.

【Abstract】 In the consumer fraud lawsuit, the "fraud" in accordance with the fact that the burden of proof " of Classification of the legal elements" should be allocated to the consumers, Should not be assigned by the judges to change the statutory allocation of the burden of proof. Judicial Discretion should be used in "proof evaluation" and "discretion" and other links. To solve difficult cases should insist on strict compliance with the statutory burden of proof on the basis of the principle of distribution, through judicial proceedings of practice, the specific rules that the path to be resolved.

【Key Words】 Consumer fraud, the distribution of the burden of proof, discretion, Path Selection