韩 波

【摘 要】 举证时限制度设置的目的应为确立与法定顺序主义相适应的“双阶型”审判流程。证据适时提出主义赋予了法官过大的裁量权，与设置我国举证时限制度的目的相去甚远。我国民事审判流程的革新本身是想朝着“双阶型”审判流程而去，却深受民法法系国家证据随时提出主义的影响，淡化了驱动“双阶型”审判流程的法定顺序主义，最终陷入“裁量陷阱”。《举证时限通知》的进步在于对法官在举证时限制度运行中过度裁量权的限缩。举证时限制度的合目的运行不仅需要程序技术的进步，更需要程序伦理的支撑与推动。《举证时限通知》的进步仅仅是程序技术方面的进步。

【关键词】 举证时限；法定顺序主义；证据适时提出主义；裁量

【中图分类号】 D915.13

【文献标识码】 A

【文章编号】 1674-1226（2010）06-0688-07

The Scope of Discretion on the Time Limit System of Inducing Evidence. Han Bo. China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 100088.

【Abstract】 The time limit system of inducing evidence should be set with the purpose of establishing the “Two-Stage Model” trial structure adapting to the Legal doctrine in order. Too much discretion is vested to the judge according to the system of inducing evidence at limit time, which is far away from the purpose of the time limit system of inducing evidence. Because of the deep influence by the system of inducing evidence at any time,the innovation of China’s Civil Judicial Structure aiming at the “Two-Stage Model” , dilutes the Legal doctrine in order which propels the “Two-Stage Model” trial structure, eventually falls into the "discretionary trap". The achievement of “The Notice to Produce Evidence” is to confine the discretion during the process of the time limit system of inducing evidence. However, the time limit system of inducing evidence running in accordance with its purpose not only depends on the perfection of the procedural technique, but also needs more support and promotion from the procedure ethnic. While the progress of “The Notice to Produce Evidence " is confined to the technical aspects.

【Key Words】 The time limit system of inducing evidence, The Legal doctrine in order, Inducing evidence at limit time, Discretion