高 咏

（北京第二外国语学院 北京 100024）

【摘 要】非法证据排除规则中的“程序性规范”具有重要的诉讼价值，主要体现在保障被告人的程序性辩护权、制约法官的程序性裁判权和保障非法证据排除规则得以实施三个方面。作为一种司法裁判机制，排除非法证据的程序必须具备基本的诉讼形态。非法证据排除程序与实体性裁判在诉讼标的、裁判依据、审判程序、证明机制等诸方面存在重大差异，在诉讼中，程序性裁判作为一种独立的裁判，与实体性裁判共同构成复合型的刑事诉讼。

【关键词】程序性裁判；非法证据排除规则；程序法律思维

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2015）06-0663-07

The proceeding thoughts in the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence. Gao Yong. Beijing International Studies University Beijing 100024

【Abstract】“Procedural Norms” in the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence presents a significant value in litigation proceedings. Procedural norms manifest value in three aspects: guaranteeing the defendant’s procedural right to defense, the restraining judge’s procedural decision-making power, and guaranteeing application of the exclusionary rule. As one judicial judgment mechanism, the exclusionary rule shall consist of the basic litigation forms. There exists significant difference between procedural rules and substantive decisionmaking rules when to exclude illegally obtained evidence. Such difference exists in various aspects including the object of action, adjudication basis, trial procedure, proof mechanism, etc. In litigation proceedings, procedural decision-making as an independent decision-making power, and the substantive decision-making power constitute a compound criminal litigation system.

【Key Words】 Procedural decision, The exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence, The proceeding thoughts