证据科学杂志
辩证据真伪 铸法治基石

2015年

2015年第23卷第6期 双月刊

2015年

2015年第23卷第6期 双月刊
第1期 第2期 第3期 第4期 第5期 第6期

鉴定意见的证明路径和限度

拜荣静

(兰州大学法学院,甘肃兰州 730000)

【摘 要】当前社会分工的日益细化使社会关系错综复杂,纠纷的涉及面也不断扩大。但是由于囿于法学知识的局限性,很多专业性问题并非法律人所能了解掌握,而鉴定意见的存在无疑给他们带来了证明的曙光。鉴定意见以其科学、公正、高效的面貌展现在人们面前而备受推崇,依靠司法鉴定所支撑的鉴定意见证明在诉讼中更是不可或缺。然而,由于受到人为因素以及科技理论之间博弈的影响,使得鉴定意见证明也存在一些不可回避的问题。如何正确看待鉴定意见在诉讼中的证明作用及其适用限度,对于程序公正有着重要的意义。

【关键词】诉讼;鉴定意见;证明

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226(2015)06-0750-09

The proof process and limits of forensic expert opinion. Bai Rongjing Lanzhou University Law School,Lanzhou 730000

Abstract】The increasingly refined social division of labor has complicated the social relations and resulted in an expansion of disputes. However, due to the limited knowledge of law, many professional issues could not be understood by a person specialized in law. Nonetheless, the forensic expert opinion brings dawn to the judicial proof. Forensic expert opinion is highly canonized for its scientific, fair and efficient features. The expert opinion based on forensic evidence is essential to the judicial proof in judicial proceedings. However, due to maintaining the balance between the human factors and the scientific theory, there are some unavoidable problems in the proof process supported by forensic expert opinion. It will be of great significance to pursue procedural justice when the role of forensic expert opinion and its limits of application are correctly approached.

Key Words】 Litigation, Forensic expert opinion, Judicial proof

 


文档下载:
  1. 鉴定意见的证明路径和限度.pdf (已下载次)