李筱永

（首都医科大学卫生管理与教育学院，北京 100069）

【摘要】涉药违法案件的认定往往依赖于检验，然而抽样取证阶段，有些证据可能会面临损毁灭失而以后难以取得的情况，故先行登记保存在药品监管中被广泛采用。由于其法律性质不清，加之过于原则、粗放式的立法现状，导致在实践中使用“先行登记保存”替代“查封、扣押”的 ；或者挖掘“先行登记保存”弥补不具有行政强制调查法律资源的现象频出，针对这些现象的发生机理，本文提出了完善的路径和建议。

【关键词】药品监管；先行登记保存；法律性质；可诉性

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2015）06-0721-13

Discussions on advanced registration and preservation in drug administration. Li Xiaoyong, School of Health Administration and Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069

【Abstract】The identification of cases involving illegal drug often depends on testing. However, in the process of sampling and evidence obtaining, there exists a situation where some evidence may be damaged and difficult to be obtained afterwards. Therefore, advanced registration and preservation is widely used in drug supervision and administration. Because the legal nature of the advanced registration and preservation is unclear, coupled with rather principled, extensive legislative situation, the phenomena that the use of the advanced registration and preservation substitutes for attachment or seizure in practice and that the advanced registration and preservation makes up for not having the legal resources of administrative mandatory investigation emerge frequently. In view of the current situation, this paper puts forward suggestions and the path to change.

【Keywords】Drug administration, Advanced registration and preservation, Legal nature, Actionablity