郑 曦

（北京外国语大学法学院，北京 100089）

【摘 要】南非在宪法中规定了非法证据排除规则，这一规则在适用范围、权利主体、规制对象、因果关系等方面都有区别与传统普通法非法证据排除规则之处，规定了“导致审判不公”和“以其他方式妨害司法”两方面的适用要求，并确立了“善意”、公共安全和紧急情况等例外，从而实现了非法证据排除规则的刚性适用和裁量适用相协调。南非由宪法规制的非法证据排除规则对于我国有一定借鉴价值，我国的非法证据排除规则可以从多个方面进行调整，促进该规则的有效适用。

【关键词】南非宪法；非法证据排除规则；规则适用

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2017）02-0153-09

The exclusionary rule of illegallyobtainedevidence under the constitution of South Africa. Zheng Xi,School of Law, Beijing Foreign Studies University. 100089, Beijing, China.

【Abstract】The exclusionary rule of illegally Obtained evidencestipulated in the Constitution of South Africa is very different from that ofthe traditional common lawsystem in many aspects, includingthe scope of application, the holder of rights, regulating objects and causality etc. The rulesetsrequirements of“render the unfair trial” and “otherwise be detrimental to the administration of justice” with exceptions of “good-faith”,public safety and emergency situations, which achievesthe coordination betweenits rigid and discretional application. The exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence under the Constitution of South Africa is worthy of learning for China. And the illegally obtained evidence exclusionary rule in Chinacould be adjusted from various perspectives to achievea more effective application.

【Key Words】 The constitution of south africa, Exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence, Application of the Rule