—《民诉法解释》第92条第3款之初步检讨

占善刚 徐 莹

（武汉大学法学院，湖北 武汉，430072）

【摘 要】《民诉法解释》第92条第3款系最高院基于遏制虚假诉讼的目的对自认产生的拘束法院的效力做出的限制，然而该款的实务适用情况显示其并不能到达抑制虚假诉讼的目的，这是因为虚假诉讼的常见形态应该是承认对方的诉讼请求，限制自认拘束力与遏制虚假诉讼之间并不存在很强的因果关系。《民诉法解释》第92条第3款既有违法院审理非身份关系纠纷的基本原理，也有悖自认的基本法法理，更会导致不必要的诉讼迟延的后果，亟待废除。

【关键词】辩论主义；虚假诉讼；审判排除效；自认拘束力

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2017）06-0674-10

Preclusion of self-admission: analysis on 2015 Judicial Interpretation of Civil Procedure Law article 92 section 3.Zhan Shangang, Xu Ying. Wuhan University school of Law, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072

【Abstract】The Supreme People's Court enacted Judicial Interpretation of Civil Procedure Law in 2015,the article 92 section 3 limits the probative value of self-admission in order to prevent litigation fraud. However,according to current judicial practice, this section failed to restrain litigation fraud. In fact, there is no strong causal link between self-admission and litigation fraud, for litigation fraud is usually committed when one party admits the opponent’s claim. This section not only violates the basic principal that governs the non-personalrelationship dispute cases, but also leads to litigation delay. The repeal of this section is in urgent need.

【Key Words】 Adversarial system, Litigation fraud, Effect of preclusion, Probative value of self-admission