赵旭光

（华北电力大学人文与社会科学学院，北京 102206）

【摘 要】行政执法与刑事司法的证据衔接必须放在具体的执法领域才能看到具体的问题，就环境执法证据向环境刑事司法的衔接而言，存在着以下问题：环境执法机关片面收集违法、犯罪证据，忽视无罪证据；环境执法机关非法手段取得的证据在衔接中被技术性合法化，从而冲击排除规则的本意；环境执法机关在刑事立案的取证类似于刑事初查，但由于主体不适格、调查目的和主动性与刑事初查完全不同、取证程序与刑事诉讼有较大差距等原因，并不具有证据能力。解决问题的方法在于打破刑事侦查体制壁垒，赋予环境执法机关以除对人身采取强制措施以外的的刑事侦查权。

【关键词】两法衔接；环境执法；证据；适格主体

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2017）05-0547-11

Evidence problems and resolutions in the connection betweenenvironmentallaw enforcement andcriminal justice. Zhao Xuguang.School of Humanities & Social Sciences,North China Electric Power UniversityBeijing 102206.

【Abstract】Only in specific law enforcement fields,can welocate thespecific problems in the connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice. In terms of the connection between environmental law enforcement and criminal justice, there exist following problems:1. the environmental enforcement agency only collects evidence in favor of administrative sanction and criminal penalty, ignoring the evidence of innocence;2. evidence obtained illegally by the environmental enforcement agency is legalized through technical methods during the connection, which distorts the real purpose of the exclusionary rules;3. although obtaining the evidence by the environmental law enforcement agencyduring the criminal case-docketing period is similar to the pre-investigation of the criminal case,suchevidence is out of competency for unqualified gatherer and material difference in the purpose and initiative relative to the criminal pre-investigation and in evidence-taking procedures relative to the criminal proceedings and other reasons.The solution to the problem is to break down the barriers in the criminal investigation system, and entitle the environmental enforcement agency the investigation power (except for the power to take coercive measures against the persons).

【Key Words】 The connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice, Environmental law enforcement, Evidence, Qualified Subject