证据科学杂志
辩证据真伪 铸法治基石

2017年

2017年第25卷第5期 双月刊

2017年

2017年第25卷第5期 双月刊
第1期 第2期 第3期 第4期 第5期 第6期

认罪认罚从宽制度若干证据问题研究

 王永强  

(四川省成都市人民检察院,四川 成都 610041)

【摘 要】认罪认罚从宽制度中的证据问题亟待研究和讨论。认罪认罚从宽制度的核心要义应当是及时正当获取“认罪”证据,有效惩治犯罪。被追诉人认罪的自愿性是认罪认罚从宽制度适用的前提,需要相关机制予以保障。我国认罪认罚从宽制度中并未免除控诉机关的控诉证明责任。当前,学界和实务界对认罪认罚从宽制度的证明标准存在不同认识。认罪认罚从宽制度应当坚持常规证明标准,并将“从宽”的量刑证明标准予以完善。我国认罪案件证明模式可以归纳为“以被告人供述为中心的简单(形式)印证模式”,认罪认罚案件证明模式改革需要做好“一个强化”和“一个转变”两项工作。

【关键词】认罪认罚从宽;证据能力;证明责任;证明标准;证明模式

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226(2017)05-0526-10

Several evidence-related issues on the pretrial leniency system of guilty plea. Lv Yao, Wang Yongqiang, Chen Cheng. The People’s Procuratorate of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China 610041.

Abstract】The evidence-related issues in the pretrial leniency system of guilty plea urgently need studying and discussing. The main purpose of the leniency system of guilty plea is to obtain the evidence of “guilty plea” in time and to punish the crime effectively. The voluntariness in the accused’s guilty plea shall act as the prerequisite for the application of this pretrial procedure, which shall be protected and maintained by relevant mechanisms. In China, the pretrial leniency system of guilty plea does not exempt the prosecutor from the burden of proof. At present, the academic and practical circles have different understandings towards the standard of proof in this system. The leniency system of guilty plea should adhere to the general standard of proof, and better improve the “standard of proof in sentencing with leniency”. The proof mode in cases of guilty plea can be summarized as “a simple (formal) model focused on the accused’s statements” and the reform of the aforementioned proof mode calls for more attention on “One Reinforcement” and “One Shift”.

Key Words】 The leniency system of guilty plea, Competency of evidence, Burden of proof, Standard of proof, Mode of proof

 


文档下载:
  1. 认罪认罚从宽制度若干证据问题研究.pdf (已下载次)