—评陆而启《意见裁判主义》

郭 薇

（北海道大学法学研究科，北海道，日本）

【摘 要】从陆而启所著的《意见裁判主义》一书的研究谱系和其可行性来看，“意见裁判主义”已有一定的理论和实践基础。首先法实证主义为“意见裁判主义”的主张提供了一定的理论背景，反过来“意见裁判主义”也可以看作是法实证主义理论的一种适用；而意见裁判主义的主张也在一定程度上符合法律推理的特质。其次，司法作为意见交流的平台既与法功能论视现代司法为重要的公共交往渠道的观点吻合，又是利益多元社会中司法判断获得正当性的一种方式。但“意见裁判主义”理论在保障辩护人的权利 , 达成多方合意的效果以及具体实施方式等方面还不明朗。

【关键词】意见裁判主义；后真相；司法

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2017）03-345-09

Justice in the era of post-truth-a book review of the doctrine of opinion-based adjudication written by professor Lu Erqi. Guo Wei, Graduate School of Law, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan 060-0809

【Abstract】Observing the research spectrum and its feasibility of the book, the Doctrine of Opinionbased Adjudication written by Professor LU Erqi,the "Opinion-based Adjudication" has a certain theoretical and practical basis.First, the Legal Positivism provides a theoretical background for the idea of "Opinionbased Adjudication". In turn, the"Opinion-based Adjudication" can be regarded as a kind of application of the theory of legal positivism; and the claims of Opinion-based Adjudication, to a certain extent, also accord with the characteristics of legal reasoning. Second, the judicial activities, as a platform for the exchange of views, not only consistent with the view of Legal Functionism that the modern justice is an important channel for public communication, is also a way for adjudication to obtain justification in a multi-interests society. However, it is uncertain how well the "Opinion-based Adjudication" theory can do in the protection of the defendants’ rights and the achievement of multi-consensual, and its specific implementation also remains unclear.

【Key Words】 The doctrine of opinion-based adjudication, Post-truth, Justice