刘 昂

（北京政法职业学院，北京 102628）

【摘 要】《监察法》的证据规定抽象简约，无法起到规范取证行为、保障取证质量的作用，无法实现《监察法》与《刑事诉讼法》的周密衔接，这对取证活动与证据司法审查运用活动的开展带来了严重困扰。在《监察法》缺乏具体明确的证据规范标准的情况下，如何开展取证工作和证据的审查认定工作，是《监 察法》实施中急需研究解决的重大课题。这一问题的解决非一朝一日之功，当有近期和远期应对策略，近期应以价值标准为指导着力解决证据合法性问题给司法办案带来的实践难题，远期则要着力构建具有 中国特色的监察案件证据合法性标准制度体系。

【关键词】监察法；证据合法性；规范标准；价值标准；问题与应对

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2018）04-0410-10

Studies on the legality of evidence in the implementation of the P.R.C. supervision law. Liu Ang, Beijing College of Politics and Law, Beijing, 102628.

【Abstract】The evidence rules written in the P.R.C. Supervision Law is abstract and simple. Such provisions cannot play a substantive role in regulating evidence-gathering behaviors or guaranteeing the quality of evidencegathering, nor can realize a seamless connection between the Supervision Law and the Criminal Procedure Law. Instead, it brings serious problems to evidence-gathering activities and judicial review of evidence. In the absence of specific and clear rules of evidence in the Supervision Law, how to carry out the work of evidence gathering, reviewing and admitting evidence is an important issue urgently needed to be studied and solved in the implementation of the Supervision Law. It is not one day's work to solve this problem. There should be short-term and long-term strategies to deal with the problem. In the near future, we should focus on solving the practical problems brought by the legality of evidence to the judicial case under the guidance of the value standard. In the long-term run, we should focus on building a system of evidence legitimacy standards with Chinese characteristics in supervisory cases.

【Key Words】 Supervision law, Evidence legality, Normative standards, Value standard, Problems and countermeasures