高 通

（南开大学法学院，天津 300350）

【摘 要】监察非法证据虽然与刑事非法证据具有密切联系，但二者之间也存在明显分野，监察非法 证据排除规则独立于刑事非法证据规则而存在。监察非法证据的设定必须要充分考虑我国监察实践，并在打击腐败与防范权力滥用间达至小心的平衡。监察机关在推进法治化进程中的特殊定位、监察非法证 据排除规则在防范监察权力滥用方面的作用、打击腐败行为的需求以及监察权作用领域不同，是界定非 法证据时着重考虑的几个因素。可依据权力违法的程度以及公民基本权利被侵犯的程度，来设定监察非 法证据的排除标准。

【关键词】监察机关；非法证据；排除规则

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2018）04-0399-11

A legal hermeneutics analysis of illegal evidence in the supervisory procedure. Gao Tong. Nankai University school of law, Nankai University Human Rights Research Center, Tianjin, 300350.

【Abstract】Though the illegal evidence in supervisory procedure has a close relationship with that in criminal procedure, there are differences between the two kinds of illegal evidence. The exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in the supervisory procedure has an independent status. In enacting exclusionary rule in supervision procedure,some elements need to be considered, such as the function of supervisory committees in building the rule of law, the effect of the exclusionary rule of preventing the abuse of power, and the demand of anti-corruption. The criterion of the exclusionary rule is how the supervisory committees violate the law and how the rights of citizens are infringed.

【Key Words】 Supervisory commissions, Illegal evidence, Exclusionary rules