艾 明

（西南政法大学法学院，重庆 401120）

【摘 要】技术侦查证据使用问题是我国刑事司法实务中出现的一个新问题。观察实务运作，涉及的主要问题有：监听译文的使用问题、另案监听所获证据的使用问题、技术侦查证据的鉴真问题、技术侦查证据的排除问题。对这些问题，我国法官的应对尚处于朴素的“自发”阶段，欠缺相应的法理思考。对监听译文的使用，我国应构建相应的证据规则，包括：统一监听译文的制作主体和制作程序；监听译文的制作应当全面、具体、客观；对监听译文的证明力采取“严格补强”规则。对另案监听所获证据的使用，我国应当采取相对限制说。对技术侦查证据的鉴真，我国应当进一步明确鉴真的证明标准和证明方法。对违反实体要件和程序要件的技术侦查证据，我国应当实行严格的排除规则。

【关键词】技术侦查；证据；刑事裁判；司法实务；法理

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2018）05-0547-16

Utilization of technical investigation evidence. Ai Ming. The Law School of Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120.

【Abstract】The use of technical investigation evidence is a new problem in China's criminal justice practice. Judicial practice shows that the major problems in the use of technical investigation evidence are the problem of the monitoring translation text utilization, the problem of other monitoring evidence utilization,the authentication of technical investigation evidence, and the exclusion of technical investigation evidence.To these issues, the response of our judges is still at the simple "spontaneous" stage. As regards the utilization of the monitoring translation text, China should set up appropriate rules, including unifying the producer and production procedure firstly. Secondly, the production of the monitoring translation text should be comprehensive,specific and objective. Thirdly, as regards probative value of the monitoring translation text, it should take "strict corroboration " rule. In terms of the utilization of other monitoring evidence, China should take a relative limit doctrine. Concerning the authentication of technical investigation evidence, China should further clarify the proof standards and proof methods. To technical investigation evidence that fails to match entity requirements and procedural requirements, china should implement strict exclusive rules.

【Key Words】 Technical investigation, Evidence, Criminal adjudication, Judicial practice, Jurisprudence