【摘要】预决效力，即生效法院裁判或仲裁裁决所确认的事实在后诉的效力，对于其性质的认识及其适用标准在实践中难以统一。应当将预决效理解为判决的事实上的证明效力，其模式为“书证证明力+公文书证明力”。已决事实原则上发挥书证证明力；在此基础上，满足一定的主体和客体条件的已决事实具备公文书证明力。当事人若对前者提出异议，应当提出相反证据加以反驳；对后者提出异议，应当提出相反证据加以推翻。

【关键词】预决效；已决事实；事实证明效；书证证明力；公文书证明力

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226(2023)04-0459-14

Analysis on the nature of the pre-judgement effect and the reconstruction of the rules.Ma Long&Ke Zihan,School of Law,Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,Ganzhou 341000.

【Abstract】Pre-judgment effect refers to the effect that the facts determined in a prior lawsuit or arbitration would take in a subsequent litigation.In practice,it is difficult to unify the understanding of the nature of this concept and its application standard.The pre-judgment effect should be taken as the prior judgement’s de facto probative value.Its proof mode is"documentary proof and public records proof".Generally,the previously determined facts are probative as the documentary evidence.On this basis,the previously determined facts could be probative as public records evidence if certain requirements related to subject and object are met.If the parties raise objections to the former proof,they should produce contrary evidence to refute it.When objections are raised to the latter proof,opposing evidence should be produced to overturn it.

【Key Words】Pre-judgement effect；Determined facts；De facto probative value.；Documentary proof；Public records proof