［荷］弗洛里斯·贝克斯 ［荷］维奥拉·贝克斯-雷米特著 杜文静 译

【摘 要】在本文中，我们旨在分析一种法律案件中证据推理的系统方法—故事与论证的混合理论—能否适用于一个新的法律领域，即欧洲庇护法。这个分析为检验混合理论在刑法语境之外的适用性提供了一个案例研究。此外，该分析将为如何利用混合理论改进庇护案件中证据评价的规范框架提供见解。

【关键词】 证据；论证；庇护案例

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2021）06-0756-13

Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments.F.J. Bex¹,V.M.Bex-Reimert².Translated by Du Wenjing³.1.Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; 2.Department of Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and Public Administration, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; 3.Wenbo College, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, 201620.

【Abstract】In this article, we aim to analyse whether a systematic method for reasoning with evidence in legal cases – the hybrid theory of stories and arguments – can be applied to a novel legal domain, namely European asylum law. This analysis serves as a case study for testing the applicability of the hybrid theory outside of the context of criminal law. Furthermore, the analysis will provide insights on how the hybrid theory can be used to improve the normative framework for evidence assessment in asylum cases.

【Key Words】Evidence; Argumentation; Asylum cases