—基于程序协调的视角

潘 侠

（中国海洋大学法学院，山东 青岛 266100）

【摘 要】《监察法》的出台催生了监察程序与刑事诉讼程序之分。监察证据和刑事诉讼证据的衔接问题表面上是基于职务犯罪案件处理程序的割裂而产生的法规范适用的纠结，实质关切则在于如何保障作为定案根据的证据的可靠性。因程序对可靠证据的塑造作用，宜吸纳程序法定原则的精神内核，从程序相协调的视角搭建证据衔接框架，并通过进一步明确职务犯罪监察调查程序设置的对象、调整程序以适应实践需求并兼顾当事人等权利保障价值、加强实物证据保管程序的规范性等做法细化证据衔接的路径。

【关键词】监察证据；刑事诉讼证据；程序法定原则；程序协调；衔接

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2021）04-0404-13

Coherence of supervisory evidence and evidence in criminal proceedings-from the perspective of coordination of procedures. Pan Xia, Law School, Ocean University of China, Qingdao Shandong 266100.

【Abstract】The supervision law brings the distinction between supervision procedure and criminal procedure. On the surface, the problem of the coherence of the supervisory evidence and the evidence in criminal proceedings stems from the entanglement of the application of legal rules arising from the separation of the procedure for dealing with official crimes, but the real concern is how to ensure the reliability of the evidence used as the basis for case closure.Because of the shaping effect of procedures on reliable evidence, it is advisable to absorb the spiritual core of the principle of procedural legality and to build a framework of evidence connection from the perspective of coordination of procedures. In addition, it is advisable to clarify the object of the supervisory organ's investigation procedure on official crimes, adjust the procedure to meet the practical needs as well as give consideration to the value of protecting the rights of the parties concerned, and strengthen the standardization of physical evidences' custody procedure, so that to facilitate evidences' coherence.

【Key Words】Supervisory evidence; Evidence in criminal proceedings; Principle of procedural legality; Coordination of procedures; Coherence