陈志华

【摘 要】 本文回顾了我国医疗纠纷鉴定体制发展历程，分析了医学会鉴定与司法鉴定的优缺点。在此基础上，认为在现阶段，医学会参与医疗损害鉴定具有一定的、但并不充分的法律依据，具有相对的合法性，医学会应属“准”法定鉴定部门。可以通过最高人民法院制定司法解释或卫生部制定规章的方式使其尽快“转 正”。 尽管如此，医学会作出的鉴定结论并不具有必然的证明力，其鉴定程序和鉴定书形式等亦应符合法律规定，而鉴定人署名并出庭接受质证是其鉴定结论被法院采信的前提条件。

【关键词】 侵权责任法；医学会；司法鉴定机构；医疗损害鉴定；合法性

【中图分类号】 D915.13

【文献标识码】 A

【文章编号】 1674-1226（2011）03-0275-15

Research on Legality of Medical Malpractice Identification Conducted by Medical Association.Chen Zhihua. Direct or and Attorney of Beijing Angelo Chen Law Firm.

【Abstract】 This paper first reviews the development of medical malpractice identification in China and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the identification conducted by medical associations and judicial appraisal institutions. And then the author concludes that medical association is currently “a quasi-legal appraisal institution” with partial legality, whose appraisal is legally necessary but insufficient. It can become an official legal appraisal institution by the judicial interpretation or regulation issued respectively by the Supreme People' s Court or the Ministry of Health Care. However, even so, the author does not think that the conclusion made by medical association can legitimately be deemed competent in proof. Its appraisal procedure and the format of appraisal document must meet the requirements of relevant laws and regulations. Furthermore, that appraisal experts must sign the appraisal document and be cross-examined in court is a precondition for the conclusion being admitted by court.

【Key Words】 Tort Liability Act, Medical association, Judicial appraisal Institution, Medical malpractice identification, Legality