胡晓翔

（南京市卫生局政策法规与卫生监督处，江苏南京 210008）

【摘 要】医疗事故技术鉴定被运用于诉讼活动就是司法鉴定，它与法医类司法鉴定，是不同类别的鉴定，适用范围不同。作为《侵权责任法》专列的一类特殊侵权类型，其技术鉴定的名称，以“医疗损害责任技术鉴定”为妥。目前委托医学会进行医疗损害责任技术鉴定具有充分的法律依据。医疗纠纷争议中最为关键的“诊疗行为的过错”及“过错与损害后果之间的因果关系”这两个问题，正是法医病理鉴定、法医临床鉴定所无权涉及的内容。

【关键词】医疗事故技术鉴定；医学会；医疗损害责任技术鉴定；法医类司法鉴定；超范围鉴定

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2014）06-0760-09

To make a practical inquiry in the identification of medical accidents. Hu Xiaoxiang. The Policies and Regulations and Health Supervision of Nanjing Public Health Bureau, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210008

【Abstract】Judicial identification can be seen as technical appraisal of medical accidents used in the legal issues, which is different from forensic judicial authentication in the range of application. As a special type of Tort Liability Law, it is sensible to denominate it as “Medical Injuries Responsibility Technical Identification”.The practice accords with legal substratum to authorize Medical Association to be responsible for medical injuries responsibility technical identification. The two critical questions in medical dispute controversy are “the fault of diagnosis and treatment behavior” and “the Cause-and-effect relationship between the fault and the result of injury outcome”, which is quite another thing for Forensic Pathology Identification Forensic Clinical Identification that have no rights to involve in.

【Key Words】 Technical appraisal of eedical accidents, Medical association, Medical injuries responsibility technical identification, Forensic judicial authentication, Identification out of scope