王志刚

（重庆邮电大学法学院，重庆 400065）

【摘 要】电子数据的获取程序是否规范直接影响电子数据真实性的认定。电子数据提取笔录由于能够客观反映电子数据获取的过程而成为对电子数据进行鉴真的重要依据，它既能够连接电子数据与案件事实，又反映了取证过程的合法性和保管链条的完整性。从属性上看，电子数据提取笔录具有独立的证据属性，它不仅有别于物证、书证和证人证言，而且有别于其他笔录类证据。对电子数据提取笔录的证据资格和证明力的判断也具有特殊性。当前，可通过同步录音录像、引入外部监督、明确制作人员义务等方式规范电子数据提取笔录的适用。

【关键词】电子数据提取笔录；数据鉴真；证据属性；规范适用

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2014）06-0668-10

On the nature and application about record of collection of electronic evidence. Wang Zhigang. Law school,Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 40065

【Abstract】Whether the collection procedure of electronic evidence is in line with the requirements of electronic evidence, will directly influence the determination of authenticity. Because the record of collection of electronic evidence (Hereinafter referred to as ‘The Record’) can reflect the collection procedure objectively, it plays as an important basis for the authentication of electronic evidence. The record can connect the electronic data with the facts of the case, and it also reflects the legitimacy of the evidence collection process and the integrity of the storage chain. As a kind of evidence, the record has the nature of independence; it is different from the material evidence, documentary evidence and witness testimony, and is different from other transcripts of evidence. In addition, there exists special rules in examining the evidence ability and proof of the probative force of the record.In order to regulate the application of the record, at present, we can use the methods including synchronous video taping, introducing external supervision and establishing the personnel obligations of the producers..

【Key Words】 Record of collection of electronic evidence, Authentication of electronic evidence, Nature of evidence, Regulation of application