谢 波

（重庆警察学院 法学系，重庆 401331）

【摘 要】我国 2012 年《刑事诉讼法》首次在基本法律中规定了警察出庭作证内容。但是，在《刑事诉讼法》预设的刑事诉讼体制未发生本质变革的情况下，警察出庭作证新规会陷入结构性二元矛盾之中，其表现出的宣示意义多于实践价值。这种二元矛盾包括刑事诉讼学理知识体系与刑事诉讼体制的矛盾、刑事诉讼体制内部的矛盾两个方面。前者在警检关系模式与警察出庭作证的关系中有所体现，后者分析我国警检机关对警察出庭作证的态度可以看到。通过具有折衷意义的“第三条道路”，构建一种有限度的警察出庭作证认识论，是对当前我国警察出庭作证问题的有益反思。

【关键词】警察；出庭作证；刑事诉讼；第三条道路

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2014）05-0544-13

Examining problems of police testifying in court in china: taking the relationship between police and procuratorate as a starting point. Xie Bo Department of Law, Chongqing Police College, Chongqing 401331

【Abstract】For the first time, the 2012 China Criminal Procedure Law lays the fundamental requirement on police testifying in court. However, under the condition of no essential change to the criminal procedure system which is provided by Criminal Procedure Law, the rules of police testifying in court will fall into the structural binary contradictions, and the rules simply show more declared significance than practical value.The contradictions include two aspects. One is contradiction between academic knowledge system of criminal proceedings and the criminal procedure system in practice. The other is internal conflict within the criminal procedure system. The former is reflected in the relationship between patterns of relationship of police and procuratorate and police testifying in court, and the latter is observed by analyzing the attitude of Chinese police and procuratorate to police testifying in court. It is the beneficial reflection to the problems of police testifying in court in China today by a third way which is a compromise choice. This third way proposes to construct limited epistemology on the police testifying in court.

【Key Words】 Police, Testifying in court, Criminal proceedings, Third way