—兼论审判中心主义的实现路径

吉冠浩

（北京大学法学院，北京 100871）

【摘 要】中国刑事证明标准存在“法律规定中的实质一元论”与“司法实践中的多元论”两种模式，其所处的场域皆是刑事诉讼的三阶段论。刑事证明标准具有“作为拟制标准的参照功能”与“作为裁断标准的授权功能”，该两大功能在现有证明标准模式中均是失范的。因此，有必要提出可以彰显功能的“形式一元论”，即我国现行刑诉法关于证明标准的规定应被解读为 ：在刑事诉讼中只存在审判阶段唯一的证明标准。在我国诉讼构造尚未发生实质变革的当下，坚持“形式一元论”是实现审判中心主义体系化路径的关键一环。

【关键词】证明标准；审判中心主义；形式一元论；三阶段论；诉讼构造

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2015）06-0694-13

Advocate for the formal monism of standard of proof in criminal cases: possible ways to trial centralism. Ji Guanhao. Peking University School of Law, 100871

【Abstract】There are two models of standard of proof in criminal trials --- Essential Monism in the book of law and Pluralism in the practice. Both models work in the three-phase criminal proceeding. The proof standard in criminal cases ought to play the role of “fictional reference” and “warrant of decision-making”. But neither of the two functions has been performed successfully. It is therefore necessary to introduce the theory of the Formal Monism, under which the standard of proof in criminal cases is proposed to be the only standard. The Formal Monism is critical to further the trial centralism before any reform on procedural structure is taken in China.

【Key Words】 Standard of proof, Trial centralism, Formal monism, Three phases of criminal procedure,Procedural structure