张 伟

（中国政法大学法学院，北京 100088 ；北京市西城区人民检察院，北京 100035）

【摘 要】本文围绕非法证据排除规则语境下非法证据的内涵展开论述，提出非法证据应当是通过违法手段获取的且侵犯了当事人合法权益的证据，特别指出通过侦查谋略获取的证据一般不属于非法证据。非法证据的适用范围应当涵盖所有取证人非法获取的证据和所有证据种类，应当包括有罪和无罪证据，非法获取的符合客观事实的证据也应当包括在内。最后，文章还就我国非法证据排除规则的完善提出了建议，要进一步明确非法证据的概念和内涵并适当扩大其适用范围，并健全适用的例外制度，同时要规范排除规则和排除程序。

【关键词】非法证据;内涵;适用范围;规则完善

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2015）05-0553-09

The study on exclusion of illegal evidence and improvement of the exclusionary rules. Zhang Wei. (PostDoctor of Law School, China University of Political science and Law, People’s Procuratorate of Xicheng District,Beijing, 100035)

【Abstract】This paper concentrates on connotation of the exclusionary rules on illegal evidence, proposes that illegal evidence is obtained through illegal methods and offends the legal rights of the parties involved, and particularly points out that evidence obtained through investigation strategies should not be taken as illegal evidence. The application of the exclusionary rules should include all the evidence and types of evidence obtained through illegal methods,no matter it is for or against the suspect, even if it reflects the truth. At last, this paper provides suggestions for the improvement of the exclusionary rules in China: to clarify the meaning of illegal evidence, to extend its application moderately, to promote the exception principles of its application, and to regulate the rules and procedures of the exclusionary rules.

【Key Words】 IIllegal evidence; Connotation of illegal evidence; Application of the exclusionary rules; The improvement of the exclusionary rules