樊崇义 李思远

（中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院，北京 100088）

【摘要】我国三大诉讼法陆续将电子证据作为一项独立的证据种类纳入立法，这给我国传统证据规则带来了冲击。纵观我国现有法律法规，对于电子证据的收集、保全、审查、判断、运用等方面证据规则的规定，仍旧散落在部分法律条文及相关司法解释当中。多数学者都承认我们迎来了电子证据时代，但“有立法、无规则”已经成为制约电子证据发挥其应有作用的最大瓶颈。实践中司法机关不得不参照既有的证据规则，常常会出现“不会用、不敢用、不能用”的现象，导致相当数量的电子证据被排除在案件事实证明范围之外，不利于案件事实真相的查明和作出公正的裁决。对于电子证据的运用，除了要遵循证据的真实、完整、合法等基本规则，还要结合电子证据自身特点对其规则进行完善。

【关键词】电子证据，证据规则，电子证据规则

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2015）05-0517-14

Discussion on electronic evidence rules in criminal procedure. Fan Chongyi Li Siyuan. Institute of Procedural Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China

【Abstract】In three major procedural laws of China, electronic evidence is regarded as an independent type of evidence and incorporated into legislation , which put an impact on traditional evidence rules. Throughout the existing laws and regulations, rules on collection, preservation, check, judgment and application of electronic evidence , are still scattered in some laws and judicial explanations. A great majority of scholars have acknowledged that we ushered the period of electronic evidence. Nevertheless,“legislation without rules” becomes the biggest bottleneck, which blocks the functions of electronic evidence. Practically, judicial authorities have to refer to the existing evidence rules, always leading to a phenomenon of“do not use, dare not use and can not use”, which makes a quantity of electronic evidences excluded from the proof of facts and is against the investigation of the truth and true verdicts. In addition to following the evidence of the true, complete, legal and other basic rules, we should also combine the characteristics of electronic evidence itself to improve its rules.

【Keywords】Electronic evidence, Evidence rules, Electronic evidence rules