刘 鑫^1，2，3  连宪杰²

（1.“2011 计划”司法文明协同创新中心（中国政法大学），100088 ；2.证据科学教育部重点实验室（中国政法大学），100088 ；3.中国政法大学医药法律与伦理研究中心，100088）

【摘 要】我国部分地方法院制定了有关医疗损害赔偿纠纷案件审理的地方性司法指导文件，其中关于举证责任分配等证据内容既有成功之处，也存在一些问题。这些文件制定的成因主要是基础法律法规的变动，相关司法解释的缺位以及现实案件审理的强烈需求。这些规定也将为国家制定相关司法解释提供有益的借鉴。

【关键词】医疗损害 ；医疗侵权 ；证据 ；地方司法指导文件 ；地方法院

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2015）02-0184-25

Studies on evidence provisions in local judicial guidance documents regarding medical tort cases. Liu Xin^1，2，3, Lian Xianjie. 1.Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization, Beijing, 100088; 2.Key Laboratory for Evidence Science (China University of Political Science and Law), Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100088; 3.Center for Health and Pharmaceutical Law and Ethics, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 100088

【Abstract】There have been a widespread making and implementation of local judicial guidance regarding medical indemnity dispute cases throughout China. Evidence rules in these documents such as allocation of the burden of production provide benefits to trial, while a series of problems also exist. The main causes to promulgate these documents include changes in basic laws and regulations, absence of related judicial interpretations and the strong demand in practice in case trials. These provisions will also provide a useful reference to develop corresponding national judicial interpretations.

【Key Words】 Medical damage, Medical tort, Evidence, Local judicial guidance documents, Local courts