—以100例司法裁判为研究样本

陈 娜

（中国政法大学刑事司法学院，北京 100088）

【摘 要】巨额财产来源不明罪证明责任的司法适用分歧，折射了关于证明责任和无罪推定之间关系认识的模糊不清。巨额财产来源不明罪中被告人应当承担的证明责任，不宜理解为“提供证据的责任”，而应阐释为“较大可能性”或“优势证据”标准的“说服责任”，这一结论的得出，是基于无罪推定原则的合理限制角度，充分考虑该罪立法目的以及在我国的司法适用情形，从比例原则的角度进行的正当性考量。

【关键词】说服责任；法律推定；无罪推定原则；比例原则

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2016）06-0712-11

The empirical analysis on the burden of proof of the crime of holding a huge amount of property with unidentified sources. Chen Na, College of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing,100088.

【Abstract】The divergence of the judicial application in burden of proof of the crime of holding a huge amount of property with unidentified sources reflects the confusion in the relationship between burden of proof and presumption of innocence. The burden of proof taken by the defendant in the crime of holding a huge amount of property with unidentified sources shall be understood as “burden of persuasion” with “balance of probabilities” or “preponderance of the evidence”, rather than “burden of producing evidence”. This conclusion is based on the reasonable limitation of the doctrine of the presumption of innocence, a full consideration of the crime’s legislative purpose and judicial practices and justification according to proportionality principle.

【Key Words】 Burden of persuasion, Legal presumption, Principle of presumption of innocence,Proportionality principle