王东伟

（武汉大学法学院，湖北武汉 430072）

【摘 要】在工伤认定行政诉讼案件中，举证责任分配法则对于诉讼程序胜败有重大影响。由于现有行政诉讼法对举证责任分配的规定存在不足之处，导致法院在审理工伤认定行政诉讼案件时，在类似案件中运用举证责任分配法则有所不同，判决结果迥异。所以应当探寻工伤认定行政诉讼案件举证责任分配法则，即工伤认定行为的基础事实的举证责任分配遵循实体法规定，在没有实体法规定时，遵循“谁主张，谁举证”的规则，劳动和社会保障部门对工伤认定决定的合法性承担举证责任，工伤认定的申请者对其申请符合法定条件承担举证责任。

【关键词】工伤认定 ；行政诉讼 ；举证责任

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2016）01-0043-14

Burden of proof in administrative lawsuits of work-related injury identification. Wang Dongwei. Law School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072

【Abstract】In administrative lawsuits of work-related injury identification, distribution rules for the burden of proof play a significant role. Because of the deficiencies in the burden of proof allocation rules prescribed in the Administrative Procedure law, the court exploits different allocation rules for the burden of proof in similar cases, resulting in different decisions. To establish consistent distribution rules for the burden of proof in administrative lawsuits of work-related injury identification, namely the proof burden of the basic facts should follow the substantive law, and if there is no such law, it should follow the rule of “she who asserts must prove”, which means that the labor and social security department bear the burden of proof of the legitimacy of the identification of work-related injury, and the applicants should put forward the evidence to prove that their application conforms to the statutory conditions.

【Key Words】Identification of work-related injury, Litigation, Burden of proof