丁朋超

（广东财经大学 法学院，广东 广州 510320）

【摘 要】争点整理程序能够实现案件审理质效的提升，避免突袭性裁判的发生，我国新《民事诉讼法》已确立争点整理程序的基本雏形。争点整理程序中法官认事用法之方法与争点协议简化程序均对证据提出、举证责任产生重要影响，但我国相关证据立法并未因争点整理程序的确立而发生任何改变。我国应坚持要件分类说，并在此基础上对法律上的事实推定和权利推定、间接证明与间接反证、暂定真实的心证公开以及证明妨碍的识别等制度进行重述。法官在当事人的提证达不到证明标准时应予以阐明，以实现纠纷的一次性解决。

【关键词】争点整理程序；裁判方法；证明责任；法官阐明；纠纷解决

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226（2019）06-0669-11

On the distribution of proof responsibility in the argumentation procedure. Ding Pengchao. Law school, Guangdong university of Finance&Economics, Guangzhou, 510320 China.

【Abstract】The dispute preparation process can improve the quality of case trials and avoid the occurrence of raids. The new Civil Procedure Law of China has established the basic prototype of the dispute preparation process. In the dispute preparation process, the use of the judge's confession and the simplification of the dispute agreement have an important impact on the production and presentation of evidence and the burden of proof. However, the relevant provisions has not changed due to the establishment of the dispute settlement procedure in China. China should adhere to the classification of requirements and restate the system of presumption and proof of obstruction. When the party's certification fails to meet the standard of proof, the judge should clarify it to achieve a one-time resolution of the dispute.

【Key Words】Dispute sorting procedure; Referee method; Proof responsibility; Judge clarification; Dispute resolution