证据科学杂志
辩证据真伪 铸法治基石

2019年

2019年第27卷第6期 双月刊

2019年

2019年第27卷第6期 双月刊
第1期 第2期 第3期 第4期 第5期 第6期

刑事证据补强:功能性思考、适用范围与补强程序

吴光升1  杨宝贵2

1.浙江工业大学之江学院,浙江绍兴 312030;2.浙江工业大学法学院,浙江杭州310020)

【摘 要】刑事证据补强是在需以直接证据“孤证”定罪,但针对“孤证”的法庭质证缺失或不充分而导致“孤证”真实性存疑的情形下,用以确保“孤证”具有真实性的一种诉讼机制。它的功能在于弥补法庭质证在审查直接证据真实性方面存在的不足,而不是提供一种可替代法庭质证的证据真实性审查方式。我国由于法庭质证存在诸多不足,有进一步健全刑事证据补强规则的必要。被告人口供由于不能对之进行对抗性质证,需要证据补强;被害人陈述、目击证人证言、案发现场的视听资料等直接证据一般无需证据补强,但在这些证据未经法庭质证或法庭质证不充分,且属于“孤证”时,需要证据补强。在简易程序与速裁程序中,被告人口供仍然需要证据补强,但可采取书面调查方式对之进行补强。为确保适用简易程序与速裁程序案件的被告人口供切实得到补强,一方面应对现有的书面调查方式进行细化规定,另一方面应增设促使法官积极调查核实被告人口供与补强证据的激励措施与监督措施。

【关键词】证据补强;证据补强功能;补强程序;法庭质证

【中图分类号】D915.13

【文献标识码】A

【文章编号】1674-1226(2019)06-0657-12

The corroboration of criminal evidence: Functional rethinking, the scope of application and corroborative procedure Wu Guangsheng1, Yang Baogui2. 1.Zhijiang College, Zhejiang University of Technology, Shaoxing 312030; 2.Law School, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310020.

Abstract】The corroboration of criminal evidence is a litigation mechanism to ensure the authenticity of solitary evidence under the circumstances that the defendant need to be convicted on only one direct evidence, but the lack or insufficiency of cross examination leads to the doubt of the authenticity of "solitary evidence". Its function is to make up for the shortcomings of the cross examination in examining the authenticity of direct evidence, rather than to provide an alternative way of examining the authenticity of evidence. There are many deficiencies in court cross examination in China, so there is a need to further improve the rules of criminal evidence corroboration. Because the defendant's confession can't be cross examined, it needs to be corroborate by evidence; the direct evidence such as the victim's statement, witness's testimony, audio-visual materials at the scene of the crime generally doesn't need to be corroborated by evidence, but when the evidence has not been cross examined or the cross examination is insufficient and belongs to solitary evidence, it needs to be corroborated by evidence. In summary procedure and quick adjudication procedure, the defendant's confessionstill needs to be corroborated by evidence, but it can be corroborated by written investigation. In order to ensure that the defendant's confession in the cases of summary procedure and quick determination procedure can be corroborated, on the one hand, the existing written investigation methods should be specified in detail, on the other hand, the incentive measures and supervision measures should be added to urge the judges to actively investigate and verify the defendant's confession and the corroborative evidence.

Key Words】Evidence corroboration, Function of evidence corroboration, Procedure of corroboration,Court cross-examination

 


文档下载:
  1. 刑事证据补强:功能性思考、适用范围与补强程序.pdf (已下载次)