—以安顺市毒品犯罪情况调研为素材的分析

王喜

(中国政法大学证据科学研究院，北京 100088)

　　【摘 要】 以安顺市中级人民法院近五年来审理的毒品犯罪案件作为分析样本可以看出，作为危害社会最大的毒瘤，毒品犯罪案件具有高度复杂性，也是审判实务界一直重拳打击的对象。毒品制造、交易隐蔽性强，流动性强，犯罪链条完整，犯罪行为更新迭代迅速，给案件侦破和证据收集带来挑战。毒品案件的证据相对单一，物证难以固定，主观方面难以证明，造成了毒品案件的证据之困。为破除这一困境，应当贯彻依法收集证据原则，加强证据收集的全面性、系统性和及时性，改进收集固定程序，正确适用“主观明知”的认定规则。

　　【关键词】 毒品犯罪;证据收集;主观明知;程序规范

　　【中图分类号】D915.13

　　【文献标识码】A

　　【文章编号】1674-1226(2019)04-0430-12

　　Dilemma in collecting and maintaining evidence of drug crime and ways to overcome them: based on a case study of drug crime cases in Anshun. Wang Xi. China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088

　　【Abstract】 This paper studies drug crime cases adjudicated at the Anshun Municipal Intermediate People’s Court in Guizhou Province, China over the past five years, and finds out that drug crime cases, as one of the most harmful tumors of the society, are highly complex and have been targeted by the justice departments for strictly cracking down. The high degree of concealment and mobility of drug manufacturing and drug trading, the completeness of chain of crime as well as the rapid updates in criminal act all have brought great challenges to detect and collect evidence for prosecuting such crimes. The difficulty in drug crime cases lies in the fact that evidence in such cases is relatively rare, with material evidence hard to be fixed and subjective intent not easy to be proved. In order to overcome the dilemma, we shall abide by the principle of collecting evidence lawfully, strengthen the comprehensiveness, systematism and instantaneousness of evidence collection, improve the procedure of evidence collecting and fixation, and accurately apply the rule of evaluating the constitutive element of “intentional knowing”.

　　【Key Words】 Drug crime, Evidence collection, Intentional knowing, Procedural regulation