证据科学杂志
辩证据真伪 铸法治基石

2019年

2019年第27卷第1期 双月刊

2019年

2019年第27卷第1期 双月刊
第1期 第2期 第3期 第4期 第5期 第6期

论提起公诉的证明标准

杨宇冠 郭凯伟

(中国政法大学,北京 100088)

 

  【摘 要】 提起公诉的证明标准问题,事关对公诉的正确理解。提起公诉与逮捕、定罪证明标准的关系是事关刑事诉讼证明标准体系的重大问题。从法律规定角度看,我国《刑事诉讼法》中提起公诉的证明标准与逮捕、定罪证明标准比较接近,但是提起公诉的证明标准要高于逮捕证明标准,低于审判定罪的证明标准。提起公诉证明标准可以表述为:人民检察院认为用于证明起诉的犯罪事实的证据已经查清,并且已经能够充分证明所起诉的罪行成立。厘清提起公诉的证明标准,对于完善我国的证据规则和刑事司法制度有重要意义。

  【关键词】刑事诉讼;证明标准;起诉;司法责任

  【中图分类号】D915.13

  【文献标识码】A

  【文章编号】1674-1226(2019)01-0005-13

  On the standard of proof for prosecution. Yang Yuguan, Guo Kaiwei. China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088.

  【Abstract】The issue of the standard of proof for prosecution concerns the correct understanding and application of prosecution, the relationship between prosecution and the standard of arrest and conviction. From the perspective of legal provisions, the standard of proof for prosecution in China's criminal procedure law is similar to the criteria of arrest and conviction.The standard of prosecution should be higher than the standard of arrest and lower than the standard of proof of conviction. China’s standard of prosecution can be stated as: the people's procuratorate believes that evidence is clear and sufficient to prove the criminal facts of the prosecution, and the defendantcanbe convicted. Clarifying the standard of proof for prosecution is of great significance for improving the rules of evidence and the criminal justice system in China.

  【Key Words】 Criminal proceedings, Standard of proof, Prosecution, Judicial responsibility


文档下载:
  1. 论提起公诉的证明标准.pdf (已下载次)